|
1050.10
Synergy of Synergies: We have the concept of synergy
of synergies.
Precession is not predicted by mass attraction. Chemical
compounds are not prophesied by
the atoms. Biological protoplasm is not predicted by
the chemical compounds. The design
of the elephant or the tree and their unwitting essential
respiratory-gas conversion
interexchanging is not predicted by the protoplasm.
There is nothing about an elephant
that predicts islanded star galaxies. As we get into
larger and larger systems, the total
system is never predicted by its lesser system's components.
|
|
1050.11
We know that there is DNA and RNA, any one genetic
code of which
dictates both a species and within it an individual
or special-case formulation. DNA-RNA
codes do not explain why the protoplasm could produce
either an elephant, pine tree, or
daisy. They elucidate only how. What we call viral steerability
as produced by the DNA-
RNA codes is simply our familiar and generalized angle-frequency
design control.
|
|
1050.12
DNA-RNA angle- and frequency-modulated designs are
composed
exclusively of four unique chemical constituents that
operate as guanine and cytosine; and
as thymine and adenine: inseparable but reversible tandem
pairs. The first pair occur as GC
or CG. The second pair occur as TA or AT. The DNA-RNA
codes may be read in any
sequence of those constituents, for instance, as CG
- CG - CG - GC - TA - AT - GC - TA -
TA - TA - AT CG - CG - GC, etc. (See Sec.
932.)
|
|
1050.13
We know the codes, but we do not know the "how come"
of their producing
an elephant. The complementarity of the holisticness
of these special-case individuals
balances out. An elephant does walk. Elephants are successful
designs. We have no
evidence of biological species that are inherently incomplete
designs. In the hierarchy of
hierarchies of synergies, Universe is the unpredicted
behavior of any of its sublevel
synergetics. We must start our synergetic analysis at
the level of Universe and thereafter
with [he known behavior of the greatest whole and the
known behavior of some of its
parts, then proceed as permitted mathematically to discover
its unknown parts. We have
the Greek triangle with its known 180 degrees of angle;
which together with the
knowledge of the magnitude of any two sides and their
included angle, or of any two
angles and their included side, etc., permit us to discover
the magnitude of the balance of
the triangle's six parts. Or, using trigonometry, if
we know the magnitude of any two
parts, we can ferret out the others.
|
|
1050.20
Trigonometry: The way we were taught in school about
fractions leads to
inconsistency. We were taught that fractions can be
multiplied, divided, added, and
subtracted only when the fractions consisted of identical
entities. We could not divide
three elephants by four oranges. However, trigonometry
introduced functions__which are
fractions or ratios, e.g., the sine, cosine, tangent,
cotangent, and so forth. Contradicting
our earlier lessons about fractions, these trigonometric
fractions do mix together angles
and edges of spherical triangles. This inconsistency
could have been avoided by starting
our geometry with spherical trigonometry. We would recognize
that what we call a great
circle arc or "edge" is indeed a central angle of the
sphere. We would learn that we have
central and external angles. We would spontaneously
see that plane geometry derived
from solid geometry and is an oversimplification of
localized and superficial aspects of
systems. This brings us back to angle and frequency
modulation, i.e., outward, inward,
and circumferentially around, complementary angle and
frequency oscillations and
pulsations and the congruence of the linear and angular
frequency modulations. By
teaching children plane geometry before teaching them
spherical trigonometry, society
became harnessed with a mathematical contradiction wherein
trigonometry deliberately
ratioed edge lines with angles__which clearly seemed
to be forbidden by arithmetical
fractions' law. Single lines are seemingly very different
from angles, because angles
involve two (convergent) lines. If, however, instead
of starting elementary education with
unrealistic, linear, one-dimensional arithmetic; and
then going on to two-dimensional plane
geometry; and thence to three-dimensional cubes; and
thence to spherical trigonometry ...
if we instead start synergetically with whole systems
such as spherical trigonometry, we
altogether avoid the concept of an edge and instead
learn that the arc-defined edges of
spherical triangles are the central angles of the sphere;
wherefore both the arc edges and
corners are angles, ergo ratioable. Now, having both
surface angles and central angles, we
discover that spherical trigonometry is always dealing
with whole tetrahedra whose
interior apexes are always at the center of the spherical
system; and three of whose
triangular faces are the great-circle plane triangles
hidden within the spheric system; and
whose fourth triangular face is always the arc-chord
surface triangle of the sphere. These
central- and surface-angle understandings are fundamental
to transformational thinking,
which deals with the falling-inward and precessing-outward
proclivities.
|
|
1050.30
Simplest Trigonometric Solutions: Sequence to Accompany
Poster in
color plate 1.
|
|
1050.31
Stones may be broken into ever smaller stones, but
they cannot be broken
into no stones. They may be broken into gravel and the
gravel into dust and the dust
separated into crystals that are too small to be seen
except through a lensed microscope;
or they may be further broken apart into atoms that
can be seen only through electron field
microscopes. But the stones cannot be broken into nothingnesses__only
into somethings.
And somethings are always systems.7
(Footnote 7: The energy of the blow that breaks them asunder entropically releases the energy that previously bound together the atoms of the separate somethings. Disassociative energy is radiant__entropic; associative energy is something-forming__syntropic.) |
|
1050.32
As the stones break, they have cleavage faces. They
break into irregular
polyhedra that are complex or simplex geometrically
definable systems, each of which
always has an inherent insideness and outsideness. The
number of faces__hedra__of
polyhedra cannot be reduced to less than four: the tetrahedron.
The number of sides__
gons__of a polygon cannot be reduced to less than three:
the triangle. The minimum
polyhedron of Universe is the tetrahedron, which requires
a minimum of three triangles
surrounding each of its four corners, whose four corners
are omniinterconnected with a
minimum of six edges that discretely outline the four
triangular (minimum polygon) faces.
|
|
1050.33
Make the "V for Victory" sign with two adjacent fingers.
The V is visual.
The V is a specifically visible angle. The angle is
an angle independent of the length of the
fingers__that is, independent of the length of the sides
of the angle. Angles, triangles, and
tetrahedra are conceptual pattern integrities independent
of size. Angles are always and
only fractional parts of whole circles (of 360 degrees).
Likewise, triangles are always and
only components of a priori whole physical polyhedral
systems (or of a plurality of whole
polyhedral systems) each of 720 degrees (or whole multiples
of 720 degrees) of angles
surrounding all the external vertexes describing those
systems. Only triangles produce
structural stability. Only triangles produce pattern
stability. The omnitriangulated
tetrahedron is the minimum structural system of Universe.
|
|
1050.34
Drawing or scribing are physical operations executed
upon a physical
system. Triangles can be drawn or scribed or traced
or trajectoried only upon or within an
a priori physical system, or defined by a constellation
of three physical systems within a
greater a priori system.
|
|
1050.35
There are six and only six different but always orderly
intercovarying
geometrical characteristics or integral parts of all
triangles: three surface-angle corners A,
B, and C, and three sides a, b, and c. In reality these
sides are always the central angles of
the scribed-upon system and they are only evidenced
by their surface-arc lines.
|
|
1050.36
Individual angular values or the relative interrelationships
or interratios or
functions of these parts hold true independent of the
size of the triangle. This is to say that
an equiangular triangle is equiangular and humanly conceptual
independent of the size of
any of our special case triangular experiences. The
four most useful of these functions and
their symbols are:
|
|
1050.37
The science that measures the respective angle magnitudes
of the six ever-
orderly intercovarying angles of triangles is called
trigonometry. All of the geometrical
interrelationships of all triangles__spherical or planar__are
discoveringly calculated by the
same trigonometry because plane triangles are always
very small spherical triangles on
very large spheric systems such as high-frequency symmetric
polyhedra. A circle is a
spherical triangle each of whose three corner angles
is 180 degrees.
|
|
1050.38
To find the value of all the central angles (sides)
and surface (corner) angles
of any spherical triangle, we can always start by dropping
a perpendicular from any vertex
of that triangle upon its opposite side__making it into
two "right" triangles. In order to
discover all six angular values of a given triangle
it is necessary to know__in addition to
knowing the 90-degree corner__the surface- or central-angular
values of any other two of
the to-be-solved triangle's five other parts: A, B,
a, b, c. Many mathematicians have
devised strategic formulas for coping with trigonometric
solutions, most of them involving
plus or minus quadrant symbols that invite errors of
calculation.
|
|
1050.39
To make the trigonometry of the sea captain's celestial
navigation as simple
and foolproof as possible the mathematician Lord Napier
(1550 1667)8 evolved the
following diagrams and procedures. To avoid what is
known in navigation as "the 180-
degree error"__going in exactly the opposite direction
from that which will get you where
you want to go__Napier arranged the five non-90-degree
"parts" of a triangle in a five-
segment "clock."
(Footnote 8: Napier was the first to use the decimal point; he also invented logarithms for numbers. His mathematical ingenuity contributed greatly to the attainment of world ocean supremacy by the East India Company and the Royal Navy.) |
|
1050.40
Napier had two equally simple ways to solve trigonometric
problems without
plus or minus symbols, provided that any two of the
non-90-degree angles are known at
the outset. His superscript c means that Ac,
cc, Bc
are the 180-degree complements of A,
c, B. For instance, Ac + A = 180°, wherefore sin Ac
= cos A; or tan cc = cot c, etc.
|
|
1050.41
First we check-mark the two "known-in-advance" non-90-degree
parts on
Napier's five-segment clocklike pattern. It is clear
that the two already-knowns are always
either divided from one another or are side by side.
In Napier's Case One the two knowns
are side by side in the clock: Napier calls this the
case of Opposites. Opposite Case see
Rule 1 chosen unknown for first solution.
|
|
1050.42
In Case Two the two knowns are separated from one another
in the clock:
Napier calls this the case of Adjacents. Adjacent Case
see Rule 2 first unknown to be
solved.
|
|
1050.43
Napier's two easily remembered rules are:
Rule 1. The sine of any unknown part theta is equal to the product of the cosines of the two known opposite parts. This is written as: unknown's angle theta's sin = cos · cos of its two known opposite parts. Rule 2. The sine of any unknown part is equal to the product of the tangents of its two known adjacent parts. This is written as: unknown angle theta's sin = tan · tan of its two known adjacent parts. |
|
1050.44
Next we employ the appropriate formula with the known
cosine or tangent
values. Next we must remove the superscript c of the
complementaries, if any, by
substituting cosines for sines, sines for cosines, tangents
for cotangents, and cotangents
for tangents.
|
|
1051.00
Circumference and Leverage
|
|
1051.10
Complementarity of Circumferential Oscillations and
Inward and
Outward Pulsations: We have demonstrated circumferential
complementarity, the
circumferential twoness of systems such as the northern
and southern hemispheres of our
Earth. There is also concave inward and convex outward
complementarity, inward and
outward twoness. As a consequence, there are also circumferential
skew oscillations and
inward and outward pulsations.
|
|
1051.20
Central and External Angles of Systems: The tetrahedral
integrity of
internal (central) angles and external (surface) angles
of systems permits the integration of
the topological and quantum hierarchies. It is exciting
that the three internal radii give us
three edges of the tetrahedron's six edges; while the
arc chords give us the three other of
the tetrahedron's six relationships; and the center
of the spheric system and the surface
triangle's three corner-vertexes give us the four-vertex-events
having the inherent six
system relationships; which six are our coincidentally
six-positive, six-negative,
equieconomical vectorial freedoms (see Sec.
537.10).
The central angles gives us what we
call the chords of the central-angle arcs. Thus all-system-embracing
geodesic lines are
expressible in angular fractions of whole circles or
cycles.
|
|
1051.30
The Circumferential Field: The inward-outward complementations
of the
system are represented by great-circle arcs on the system's
surface, whose existence is in
reality that of the central angles of the system which
subtend those external arcs and create
the arc cyclic-duration "lengths." Areal definition
of the circumferential__ergo, surface__
complementations and their oscillations occur as the
surface angles at the vertexes of the
system's external mapping.
|
|
1051.40
Angular Functionings of Radiation and Gravity: The
differences
between the central angles' and surface angles' functionings
are identifiable with
radiational and gravitational functionings. Radiation
identifies with central angles.
Radiation is outwardly divergent. Gravity identifies
with the three surface angles'
convergent closure into the surface triangle's finite
perimeter. Gravity is omniembracing
and is not focusable. Gravity is Universe-conservingly
effective in its circumferential
coherence.
|
|
1051.50
Leverage: The principle of leverage is employed in
shears, nutcrackers, and
pliers. The longer the lever arms, the more powerful
the pressure applied between the
internal central angles of the nutcracker's lever arms.
We can make an illuminating model
of our planet Earth if we think of it as a spherical
bundle of nutcrackers with all their
fulcrums at the center of the sphere and all the radii
of the sphere acting as the lever arms
of the pincers. The whole bunch of pincers have a common
universal fulcrum at the
common center. The farther out we go on the radial lever
arms, the less effort is required
to squeeze the ends together to exert nutcracking pressure
at the center. If we go around
the sphere-embracing circumference progressively tying
up the ends of the levers together,
we find that it takes very little, local, surface effort
tensively between any two surface
points to build up excruciatingly powerful, central-compression
conditions. The bigger the
model, the easier it is to tie it up; ever more delicate
an exterior web will hold it together.
|
|
1051.51
Look at the relative distance of the atom and its outside
electron orbit. The
atom's electron field may be equivalent to our magnetic
field around this Earth. This
elucidates the electromagnetic field of Earth as a world-around,
circumferential-
embracement field operating ephemerally on the outer
ends of 4,000-mile-long levers.
|
|
1051.52
Identifying the surface-angle chordings with gravity,
we comprehend why it
is that as we get deeper and deeper within our Earth,
with the pressure continually
increasing as we get deeper, we see that the increasing
gravitational-compression effect is
due to the circumferential containment. The external
containment web is always getting
hold of the outermost ends of the centrally pinching
levers. With this leverage effect, the
farther out you go, the more advantage you have and
the more powerful work you can do
with that lever. Leverage effectiveness increases toward
the center, ergo the increasing
pressure that we identify with gravity. But it has this
circumferential aspect.
|
|
1051.53
There is a tendency to misinterpret the increasing
pressures occurring
inwardly of Earth as "deadweight," i.e., only as a radiationally-inward
force, but it must be
realized that the "weight" is omnidirectional compression.
The gravitational intermass-
attraction is progressively augmented, as we go radially
outward, by the circumferential
mass-interattraction of the relative abundance of elemental
atoms, which increases at the
second-power rate of the radial-distance outwardly from
the Earth's center; and as the
pressures bring about ever closer presence of the atoms
to one another, there is also an
additional second-power exponential gain which results
in r2 varying as proximity2 = P4,
where P = relative compressive force. The surface chordal-angle
magnitudes multiplied by
radius to the second power produce the relative magnitude
of network leverage-advantage
resulting in the relative increase in pressure as you
go inward toward Earth's center. This
is exciting because we now comprehend that gravity is
a circumferentially operative force
and not a radial force, with precession bringing about
the 90-degreeness.
|
|
1051.54
Remembering Newton's law of gravity, wherein the relative
interattractions
are directly proportional to the product of the masses
increased by the second power of
the distances between the respective mass centers, we
realize that doubling the size of a
sphere brings about an eightfold multiplication of the
circumferential mass-interattraction.
In effect, we have a network of chordal cables tensively
intertriangulating the
progressively outmost ends of the spherical nutcracker
bundle with circumferential
turnbuckles continually tightening the surface-triangulated
tensional embracement
network. This means that the pressures being exerted
internally are proportional to the
fourth power of the relative radial depth inward of
Earth's surface.
|
|
1051.55
The surface-embracement leverage-advantage of the sphere
operating at the
fourth power can always overmatch the total volumetric
gaining rate as only the third
power of radial (frequency), linear gain, as the second-power
interproximity attractiveness
is further multiplied by the second-power, radial-lever-arm,
advantage gains.
|
|
1052.00
Universal Integrity
|
|
1052.10
Second-Power Congruence of Gravitational and Radiational
Constants:
The relative mass-energy content magnitude of a polyhedral
system is arrived at by
multiplying the primitive, frequency-zero, a-priori-state
volume (relative to the
tetrahedron-equals-one) of the geometric, concentric,
structural system's hierarchy, by the
second power of the (both minimum and maximum) limit
linear velocity of all classes of
radiation when unfettered in a vacuum; i.e., multiplying
initial volume by the terminal rate
at which a spherical wave's outermost, unique-event-distinguishability
progressively and
omniexpansively occurs, as expressed in terms of the
second power of relative frequency
of modular subdivision of its initially-occurring, polyhedral
system's radius; ergo as
manifest in Einstein's equation E = Mc2. Energy equals
a given mass with its relative
mass-energy compactedness tighteningly modified by the
velocity of energy-as-radiation
intertransformability potential (not just linearly,
but omnidirectionally); ergo as a
potentially ever-expansively enlarging spherical wave's
outermost-event, one-radial-
wavelength-deep surface; ergo second power of system
frequency (because wave surfaces
grow omni-outwardly as of the second power of the radial,
linear frequency) rate of gain.
(See Secs.
231.01,
251.05,
529.03
and
541.)
|
|
1052.20
Spherical Field: As already discovered (see Sec.
964),
physics' discovery of
universally-multifrequenced, periodic-event-discontinuity
outness (in complementation to
equally frequenced, event-occurrence in-ness) is inherent
in the always-experientially-
verifiable, wave-duration frequency, photon-quantum
phenomena; wherefore synergetics
had to redefine both volumes and surfaces in terms of
dense (high-frequency) aggregates
of only pointally-positionable, energy events' geometrical
formulations, with spherical
"surfaces" being in operational reality a dense, outermost,
single-photon-thick, "cloud"
layer, everywhere approximately equidistant in all directions
from one approximately-
locatable event center. For this reason the second-power
exponential rate of area gain is
not to be identified with a continuum, i.e., with a
continuous system, but only with the
high-frequency outermost layer population aggregate
of energy-event points. With
numbers of photons and wave frequency per primitive
volume, the relative concentration
of given masses are determinable.
|
|
1052.21
Isaac Newton discovered the celestial gravitation interrelationship
and
expressed it in terms of the second power of the relative
distance between the different
masses as determined by reference to the radius of one
of the interattracted masses. The
gravitational relationship is also synergetically statable
in terms of the second power of
relative frequency of volumetric quanta concentrations
of the respectively interattracted
masses. Newton's gravitational constant is a radially
(frequency) measured rate of
spherical surface contraction, while Einstein's radiational
constant is a radial (frequency)
rate of spherical expansion. (See Secs.
960.12,
1009.31
and
1052.44.)
|
|
1052.30
Gravitational Constant: Excess of One Great Circle
over Edge Vectors
in Vector Equilibrium and Icosahedron: Pondering on
Einstein's last problem of the
Unified Field Theory, in which he sought to identify
and explain the mathematical
differentiations between electromagnetics and gravity__the
two prime attractive forces of
Universe__and recalling in that connection the conclusion
of synergetics that gravity
operates in spherical embracement, not by direct radial
vectors, and recalling that
electromagnetics follows the high-tension convex surfaces,
possibly the great-circle trunk
system of railroad tracks (see Secs.
452
and
458); led
to pondering, in surprise, over the
fact that the vector equilibrium, which identifies the
gravitational behaviors, discloses 25
great circles for the vector equilibrium in respect
to its 24 external vector edges, and the
icosahedron, which identifies the electron behaviors
of electromagnetics, discloses 31
great circles in respect to its 30 external vector edges.
|
|
1052.31
In each case, there is an excess of one great circle
over the edge vectors.
Recalling that the vector edges of the vector equilibrium
exactly equal the radial explosive
forces, while the icosahedron's 30 external edges are
longer and more powerful than its 30
radial vectors, yet each has an excess of one great
circle, which great circles must have
two polar axes of spin, we encounter once more the excess
two polar vertexes
characterizing all topological systems, and witness
the excess of embracingly cohering
forces in contradistinction to the explosively disintegrative
forces of Universe.
|
|
1052.32
Possibility of Rational Prime Numbers in High-energy
Physics
Experiments: In recent years the experiments of the
physicists, notably at the European
Nuclear Research Center (CERN), seem to provide increasing
confirmation of the
similarities in the behaviors of electromagnetic and
gravitational forces__as well as in the
bonding and radioactive effects of the atomic nucleus
(see Sec.
646.10). The ultimate
definition of a Unified Field Theory becomes tantalizingly
nearer at hand. The results and
findings of the physicists' experiments should be examined
in the light of synergetics'
models, especially the vector equilibrium, and the comprehensive
isotropicity which
derives from closest-sphere-packing and provides omnirational
accounting for radial and
circumferential coordination. This kind of examination
might account for some of the
energetic behaviors of the newly described mass particles__leptons
and hadrons, quarks
and antiquarks__in which the second-power of their masses
displays simple whole-number
relationships.
|
|
1052.33
In synergetics the number of spheres on the outer surface
of symmetrically
complete VE aggregations is equal to two plus two times
frequency to the second power
times five__the prime number that is the key to the respective
masses of both the VE and
Icosa. The equation of prime number inherency of symmetrical
structural systems (2NF2
+ 2; see Sec.
223.03)
could be considered as describing
a Unified Field Theory in which
the number of vertexes (crossings or events) can be
regarded as abstractions from the total
field corresponding to a scenario of limited conceptuality.
(Compare Secs.
419.10-20.)
|
|
1052.350
Microsystems
|
|
1052.351
A point is always a microsystem or a plurality of
microsystems__ergo, at
minimum one tetrahedron.
|
|
1052.352
A line is a relationship between any two microsystems.
|
|
1052.353
A tetrahedron is defined topologically by four conceptually
locatable
microsystems interconnected by six interrelationship
lines whose 12 ends are oriented to
corner-converge in four groups of three lines each;
these lines terminate in one of four
infratunable microsystem corners, whose at-minimum-of-three-other
corner-defining
microsystems lie outside in the tune-in-able tetrahedron
defined by the six lines. (See Sec.
505.83.)
|
|
1052.354
The tetrahedron is the minimum tunable system. A point-to-ability
is a
tuned-in tetra. Each tuned-in tetra consists of four
corners, each of which is an
infratunable tetrasystem.
|
|
1052.355
The threeness of the quarks shows up at the three
minimum convergent lines
around each vertex of the minimum system consisting
of only six lines.
|
|
1052.356
Topological components of systems and their infra-tune-in-able
corner-
vertex-locating infratunable systems ad infinitum do
not and cannot exist independent of
systems.
|
|
1052.357
The above describes the tunability of corners and
is explanatory of the ever-
reappearing quarks that disclose the primitive characteristics
of all systems, which
always__to any one human observer listening at any one
tuning-in time__consist of infra-
or ultratunable systems ad infinitum.
|
|
1052.360
Mite as Model for Quark
|
|
1052.361
Proofs must proceed from the minimum whole system
to Universe and the
differentiation-out of Universe of the special case
conceptual system. Proofs must start
from the minimum something that is the minimum structural
system. All geometrical and
numerical values derive from fractionation of the whole.
|
|
1052.362
At the maximum limit of the rational cosmic hierarchy
of primitive structural
systems we have the 120 similar and symmetrical T Quanta
Module tetrahedra that
agglomerate symmetrically to form the triacontahedron.
(See Sec.
986.) At the minimum
limit of the hierarchy are the separate A, B, and T
Quanta Modules, and at the minimum
limit of allspace-filling__ ergo, of all Universe structuring__we
have the three-module
mites consisting each of two A and one B Modules.
|
|
1052.363
The mites are the quarks. The two energy-holding A
Quanta Modules and
the one energy-dispersing B Quanta Module of which the
mite is composited exactly
correspond with the plus-two, minus-one characteristics
model of the three-separate-entity
functions of the quark. (See Secs.
262.04
and
262.05.)
|
|
1052.40
Vector Equilibrium and Icosahedron: Ratio of Gravitational
and
Electromagnetic Constants: The vector equilibrium and
the icosahedron are the same
initial twentyness. But the icosahedron is always in
either a positive limit or a negative
limit phase of its, only-pulsatingly attained, first-degree
structural self-stabilization in the
asymmetric transformation of the vector equilibrium,
which alternating pulsations are
propagated by the eternally opposed, radiant-attractive,
always dualistic, inter-self-
transformable potential of ideally conceptual unity
of Universe.
|
|
1052.41
The icosahedral phase of self-structuring is identifiable
uniquely with the
electron, whose mass relationship to the proton is as
1:18.51, whereas the icosahedron's
volume is to the vector equilibrium's volume as 20:18.51.
In this connection it is
significant that the vector equilibrium's plural unity
is 20, ergo we may say the relationship
is as unity: 18.51.
|
|
1052.42
The number of icosahedral electrons is always equal
to the number of
protons that are in the vector equilibrium's idealized
form of the same surface layer
phenomenon.
|
|
1052.43
The nonnucleated icosahedron can and does maintain
only one single, one-
wave-deep, external layer of omnicircumferentially,
omni-intertriangularly tangent,
closest-packed, unit-radius, spherically conformed,
energy-event packages; while the
vector equilibrium is both radially and omnicircumferentially,
omnitriangularly closest
packed, i.e., in maximum, intertangential, mass-interattractiveness
nucleated
concentration.
|
|
1052.44
Reminiscent of electron proclivities, the icosahedron
displays the same
surface number of spherically conformed, energy-event
packages and its only-one-
wavelength-deep, single, outer sphere layer array is
omnitriangulated, while the vector
equilibrium's surface is arrayed two-fifths in triangulation
and three-fifths in open,
unstable, square tangency. As spherical agglomerates
decrease in radius__as do the vector
equilibria's contract to the icosahedral phase__their
sphere centers approach one another,
and Newton's mass-interattraction law, which shows a
second-power gain as the
interproximities are halved, imposes an intercoherence
condition whereby as their overall
system radius decreases, their circumferential mass-interattractions
increase exponentially
as r2, where r = radius of the system. (See Sec.
1052.21.)
|
[1052.50-1052.71 Physical Periodicities Scenario]
|
1052.52
The special-case regenerative system itself may attain
maximum orderliness
while being acted upon by externally distributive forces.
Often the reason that systems do
not synchronize is that they derive from different complexes
of chemical elements. Since
every one of the interorbiting cosmic system's elements
has its unique frequencies, the
wave frequencies of the orbiting systems are like the
peaks and valleys of gear teeth whose
peak-and-valley perimeters have latch-key-like irregularities.
We have gears that rarely
interlock and must consequently remain only superficially
tangent to one another. Hence
they take up more room than they would if they had meshed.
The centers of the two
meshing gears are nearer to one another than are the
centers of the same two gears when
their teethed perimeters are not meshed. When meshed,
they are more powerfully
intermass-attracted than when nonmeshed. (See Secs.
263.02 and
522.36.)
|
|
1052.53
Gears of equal weight and of the same material might
have very many little
teeth or relatively few big teeth in each of their great-circle
cycles. The frequencies being
given off entropically do not expand in planes or lines;
they expand omnidirectionally as a
complex of differently timed radial spirals. As the
omnispheric gears fail to mesh, they
employ ever more space, and therefore we realize a physically
entropic Universe that is
everywhere locally broadcasting its disorderly information
to our sensorial receptors. Thus
it seems__to short-term, local observation__that the aggregate
discards of entropically
released energies of the various localities of the physical
Universe are expanding and even
further expending energies in an increasingly disorderly
manner. The syntropic births and
growths escape our attention, for they inherently withhold
or withdraw information
regarding their ultimately syntropic cosmic resolution
of apparent disorders__a resolution
withheld from Earthian observers who are preoccupied
with hindsight and dismayed by the
obvious only-initially-entropic disorders. But fundamental
complementarity requires that
there be other localities and phases of Universe wherein
the Universe is reconvening,
collecting, and condensively contracting in an increasingly
orderly manner as
complementary regenerative conservation phases of Universe
thus manifesting
comprehensive transitions from disorder to order, from
entropy to syntropy.
|
|
1052.54
Order and Disorder: Birth and Growth: Entropy is locally
increasing
disorder; syntropy is locally increasing order. Order
is obviously the complement, but not
mirror-image, of disorder.9 Local environments are forever
complexedly altering
themselves due to the myriad associative and disassociative
interpatterning options of
syntropy and entropy, with an overall cosmic syntropic
dominance insured by an overall
local entropic dominance. (See the "Principle of Universal
Integrity" at Sec.
231.)
Universe is a vast variety of frequency rates of eternally
regenerative, explosive, entropic
vs implosive, syntropic pulsation systems. Electromagnetic
radiant energy is entropic;
gravitational energy is syntropic.
(Footnote 9: See "Principle of Irreversibility" at 229.10) |
|
1052.55
Both entropy and syntropy are operative in respect
to planet Earth's
biospheric evolution. Wherever entropy is gaining over
syntropy, death prevails; wherever
syntropy is gaining over entropy, life prevails.
|
|
1052.56
Entropy is decadent, putrid, repulsive, disassociative,
explosive, dispersive,
maximally disordering, and ultimately expansive. Syntropy
is impulsive, associative,
implosive, collective, maximally ordering, and ultimately
compactive. Entropy and
syntropy intertransform pulsively like the single rubber
glove (see Sec.
507). There is an
entropic, self-negating, momentary self: there is also
the no-time, nondimensionable
eternity of mind. Dimensioning is apprehensible only
within temporal relativity. Time is
experienced in our relative duration lags and gestation
rates as well as in the unique
frequency interrelatedness of the electromagnetic spectrum
events and novents. Every time
we experience the novent disconnects of momentary annihilation
into eternity, naught is
lost. Mind deals only with eternity__with eternal principles.
What is gained to offset any
loss is the residual, observational lags in accuracy
inherent and operative as cognition and
the relativity of awareness that we call life. (See
Secs.
638.02
and
1056.20.)
|
|
1052.57
The life-propagating syntropy-entropy, birth-to-death
transformations
constitute the special case realizations of the complex
interactive potentials of all the
eternal, abstract, dimensionless, nonsubstantial, generalized
principles of Universe,
interplayed with the absolute "if-this-then-that" integrity
of plural cosmic unity's
intercomplementarity. The death and annihilation discontinuities
occur as eternal
generalization intervenes between the special case,
"in-time," relative intersizing of the
realizations.
|
|
1052.58
Pattern Sorting and Observing: When we are able to
observe for long
enough periods of time, however, we find all the gears
of Universe eventually meshing,
though not simultaneously. The next periodic meshing
of any two of the gears might take
a thousand years__or 28 l/2 years__or 17 seconds. The
important phenomenon to note is
that there are great varieties of periods of nonmeshing
which altogether make the
physically observed totality appear to take up ever
more room, and anywhere within this
expansiveness the locally predominant events occurring
within short spans of time appear
to be omnidisorderly. When we compound that realization
with the now-known
millionfold greater span of electromagnetic reality
and the lesser span of direct-sense
ranging of the human organism, we begin to comprehend
how readily humanity falls into
the trap of dismay, fear, and negativism in general.
Impatience engenders further
myopically disorderly incrementation of information
receipts. Those who are impatient for
the receipt of the next news broadcasts are only beguiled
by negative information. That is
what myopia looks for. Chronic shortsightedness spontaneously
seeks and tunes in only
the broadcast entropy. Syntropy incasts, in contradistinction
to entropic broadcast.
Syntropy can be apprehended only through overall or
comprehensive review of the totally
recalled information of long-term experience.
|
|
1052.59
Man has no experimental data to suggest that energy
is ever created or
destroyed. Though our own overall experience leads us
to the discovery of cyclic events
that return upon themselves, the local, momentary, physical
events seem to be giving off
energy and taking up more room despite our own syntropic
attempts to reestablish local
order. Entropy is defined as the law of increase of
the random element. But our experience
in physical exploration also reveals to us that every
pattern phenomenon has its
complementary which is rarely a mirror-image and is
most frequently invisible. As the
complementary has the effect of cosmic integrity balancing,
we realize there must be
unseen syntropic events of Universe that are always
reordering the environment. Syntropy
is the law of elsewhere-importing and always-orderly
regrouping of the entropic
exportings of all dying systems. Aging and death here
engender birth and growth
elsewhere. (See Sec.
1005.611.)
|
| Next Section: 1052.60 |